Tuesday 26 January 2016

AS -12 Accounting for Government Grants

This Accounting Standard deals with the accounting of grants received by the company from government. Grant means subsidy, cash incentives, duty drawback etc. Grants are of three types,


1. grant for specific fixed asset

2. grants in the form of promoter's contribution.

3. grants for revenue.

First take the method of accounting when grant received for specific fixed asset.

Here we have a two choice to record government grant:

first method says grant should be shown as deduction from fixed asset. Suppose a company purchased a fixed asset for 500,000 and government has given 100,000 as grant for that asset. So according to the first method, fixed asset should be recorded in balance sheet as 400,000 and automatically grant received has been credited in p&l as reduced form of depreciation. Similarly, if it purchased a machine of 200,000 and received grant of 80,000 for that asset then 1,20,000 should be recorded in balance sheet. Entry would be:

fixed asset                 dr      500,000                  
to, bank                                       500,000

(being purchased machinery in cash)

bank                 dr                     100,000
to, fixed asset                                 100,000
(being government grant received for that machine)

Refund of government grant :

if the government grant received is to be refund may be because of non fulfillment of certain conditions then entry should be reversed that is, asset is to be debited again with the amount of refund.

In the above example, if in the 3rd year, the company has to refund the amount then, asset would be debited with 100,000. entry would be:

fixed asset         dr           100,000
to bank                                  100,000
(being the grant refunded and asset is debited with the same amount)

after debiting the respective asset, depreciation is adjusted accordingly. In the third year wdv of machine was 500,000-200,000(500,000/5 *2) =300,000. In the 3rd year grant is refunded so asset will be debited with 100,000 and it should be added with 300,000 total value will be 300,000+100,000=400,000 now the year remaining is 3 more year and 400,000 should be divided by 3 so depreciation will be 1,33,333 each 3 year.

Second method, says grant received should be recorded in the liability as “deferred government grant” and should be credited to p&l accordingly to the year of the fixed asset.

Suppose, a company purchased a fixed asset for 500,000 and received government grant for 100,000 and the life of the asset is 5 year then as per second method, 100,000 should be shown as “deferred government grant” in the liability side and 100,000/5=20,000 should be credited to p&l for 5 year. And asset will be shown with full amount 500,000.

Entry would be:

fixed asset               dr      500,000
to, bank                                     500,000
(being asset purchased in cash)

bank                        dr                        100,000
to, deferred government grant                     100,000

(being government grant received)


at the end of first year, entry would be

deferred government grant        dr             20,000
to profit&loss                                                          20,000

(being the government grant credited to p&l)


depreciation               dr                 100,000

to asset                                                    100,000

(being depreciation charged)

p&l                 dr                                  100,000
to depreciation                                              100,000

(being depreciation charged to p&l)

Refund in second method:

in case of refund and company is adopting the second method, then first deferred government grant remaining in liability side should be debited and then p&l will be debited.
In the above example, refund is made in 3rd year then, 60,000 remaining in liability side as government grant should be debited and then p&l. Entry would be :

deferred government grant        dr          60,000
p&l                                            dr         40,000
to bank                                                              100,000

(being the refund of govt grant adjusted from p&l and deferred govt grant)


if grant is received for non-depreciable assets then it should be transferred to capital reserve.

Grant in the nature of promoter's contribution:

promoter's contribution means by way of contribution towards its total capital outlay and no repayment is ordinarily expected in the case of such grants. if grants are received in the nature of promoter's contribution then it should be credited to capital reserve.
Suppose, asset purchased 500,000 and government grant received 100,000 as promoter's contribution
Entry would be:

fixed asset dr 500,000

to capital reserve 100,000
to bank 400,000
(being government grant received as promoter's contribution transferred to capital reserve)


Refund of govt grant:

in case of refund in promoter's contribution capital reserve should be debited.

Entry would be:

capital reserve                   dr   ***
to bank                                            ***

Presentation of Grants Related to Revenue
Grants related to revenue are sometimes presented as a credit in the profit and loss
statement, either separately or under a general heading such as ‘Other Income’. Alternatively,
they are deducted in reporting the related expense.

Refund of govt grant:

in case of revenue, p&l account will be debited and bank will be credited.

Entry would be:

p&l                            dr   ****
to bank                                       ***


where grant is received at free of cost it should be recorded at nominal value that is, 1 rupees.


Disclosure :

1. The accounting policy adopted for government grants, including the methods of
presentation in the financial statements;

2. The nature and extent of government grants recognized in the financial statements,
including grants of non-monetary assets given at a concessional rate or free of cost.



 This was all about government grant hope you all like it and if you have any question regarding this please write me on the comment box . 

Calculation of Managerial Remuneration

Once again after a long time I am back with an important concept in corporate accounting that is, Managerial remuneration. First of all we need to understand what managerial remuneration means, it is the remuneration given to the managerial level personnel that is, whole time director, managing director, and other independent and executive director.
We know that a company is managed by the board of directors in which few are responsible to run and managed the business these are called managing director or whole time directors and other are responsible to see whether company is doing the work according to the laws and regulations and whether any interest of internal or external parties like shareholder, debenture holder etc has been affected by the conduct of the company.
So there are basically two groups in board of directors -first, who execute the business operation (get the things done from people) and other who oversee the working of first group of managers.

Before I continue to the provision of company act regarding managerial remuneration, I must say that there is a difference between managing director and whole time director. Managing director can be appointed for fixed term say 5 year but whole time director are the employee of a company working as an employee and are not appointed for fixed term. Where the work of company is diversified each whole time director is appointed for each segments. But managing director is the person managing whole business. If I talk about Larsen and Toubro company, Mr M.V. Kotwal is the whole time director of Heavy Engineering segments, Mr S.N. Subhrahmanyan is the whole time director of infrastructure and construction and so on but Mr k. Venkatraman is the only managing director of the company.
So it is clear that there is a difference between managing and whole time director.

Calculation of managerial remuneration when there is adequate profit or sufficient profit.

Now section 197 of the company act 2013 deals with the managerial remuneration. It says that overall managerial remuneration given to whole time or managing director and other independent director should not be more than 11% of the net profit of the company determine as per sec 198.

second criteria is , in that 11 % remuneration--remuneration given to whole time director or managing director should not be more than 10% of the net profit determine as per sec 198. and remuneration to other director (independent directors) should not be more than 1% of the net profit as per sec 198.

third criteria is , if there is only one managing or whole time director in a company than the remuneration to him should not be more than 5% of the net profit as per sec 198.

fourth criteria is, if there is no managing director or whole time director then the remuneration given to other directors (that is independent director) should not be more than 3% of the net profit determine as per sec198.

Independent directors are not the employee of the company they just see the workings of executive directors (that is whole time or managing directors ) they get sitting fees for their work. Their sitting fees are also included in the managerial remunerations which should not be more than 1% of the net profit

one thing should be noted that chairman is of two types executive chairman and non executive chairman. Executive chairman is treated as whole time director in calculating managerial remuneration.
Non executive is treated as other director in calculating managerial remuneration.

Sec 198 determines the net profit for the purpose of managerial remuneration. What we have to do is take net profit as per profit and loss account and add back provision for tax and all the capital expenditure included in p/l and deduct all the capital related income included in p/l.
In case of depreciation multiple shift allowance expenses is allowable and should not be added back but special depreciation is not allowable and to be added back from net profit as per p&l .

profit on sale of investment should be deducted from net profit as per p&l.

In case of profit on sale of fixed asset, it should be deducted to the extent of difference between cost and wdv of asset. For example profit on sale of machine showing in credit side of p&l is 8000 rupees, and cost of that machine was 150000 and wdv was 145000. here the difference between wdv and cost is 5000 and profit on sale is 8000 so 3000 should be deducted from net profit of the company for calculating net profit for the purpose of managerial remuneration.

Loss on sale of fixed asset should not be added back.

If the profit after appropriation is given in the question then all the reserves, dividends should be added back.

Take a question,

Net profit for the year 100,000 rupees. The following amount have also been taken into consideration in calculation of net profit:

1. provision for tax –20,000
2. subsidy received from government—30,000
3.bonus paid to technician –5000
4. depreciation (multiple shift allowance of rs 2000 is included in it)--7000
5. investment allowance reserve—700
6. compensation to injured employee—1000.
7. profit on sale of investment—2500.
8. profit on sale of fixed asset (original cost 20000 and wdv 11000)--15500
Calculate the remuneration payable to managers and other directors.

ANS:

Net profit –100,000

Add: provision for tax –20,000
investment allowance reserve—700

less: profit on sale 2500
less: profit on sale –6500


(bonus paid to technician is allowable expenses whereas, subsidy received is allowable income so they are not taken into above calculation. )

so the adjusted net profit is 111700. thus, remuneration given to managers should not be more than 10% of 111700. that is, 11170. and to the other directors not more than 1% i.e 1117
Calculation of managerial remuneration when there is no profit or inadequate profit of company:

where the effective capital is

negative or less than 5 crore----yearly remuneration should not exceed 30 lakh.

5 crore and above but less than 100 crore—should not exceed 42 lakh

100 crore and above but less than 250 crore-- should not exceed 60 lakh.

250 crore and above—60 lakh plus 0.01% of the effective capital over 250 crore.

"Effective capital" means the aggregate of the paid-up share capital (excluding share application money or advances against shares); amount, if any, for the time being standing to the credit of share premium account; reserves and surplus (excluding revaluation reserve); long-term loans and deposits
repayable after one year (excluding working capital loans, over drafts, interest due on loans
unless funded, bank guarantee, etc., and other short-term arrangements) as reduced by the
aggregate of any investments (except in case of investment by an investment company whose
principal business is acquisition of shares, stock, debentures or other securities), accumulated
losses and preliminary expenses not written off.


 Thus, it was all about managerial remuneration. Hope you all liked it . If you have any questions  feel free to write me in the comment box below.